Choosing the Right Wireless Deployment Model: Centralized, Distributed, Cloud, and More

by

·

Wireless networks are no longer optional—they’re essential. But not all wireless setups are created equal. Depending on the size, location, and goals of a business, the right deployment model can drastically improve performance, manageability, and scalability. Understanding the strengths and use cases of different wireless deployment models is key to designing a robust network.


Why Wireless Deployment Models Matter

Selecting the wrong wireless architecture can lead to poor coverage, scalability issues, and difficult management. A proper model ensures better performance, centralized control, and optimized costs based on the organization’s needs.


Key Concepts

Centralized (Controller-Based) Deployment
All access points (APs) forward traffic and control functions to a central Wireless LAN Controller (WLC). The WLC manages configurations, security, and policies.

  • Ideal for: Medium to large campus networks
  • Benefits: Centralized management, scalability, policy consistency
  • Drawback: Controller is a single point of failure without redundancy

Distributed (Autonomous) Deployment
Each AP operates independently, making its own decisions and handling management and data forwarding locally.

  • Ideal for: Small offices or isolated deployments
  • Benefits: Simple setup, no need for central controller
  • Drawback: Difficult to manage at scale, lacks centralized control

Controller-Less (Mobility Express or Embedded WLC)
An AP takes on the role of a controller for a small group of APs, combining the benefits of centralized and autonomous deployments.

  • Ideal for: Small to mid-sized businesses
  • Benefits: Centralized-like management without dedicated WLC
  • Drawback: Limited scalability

Cloud-Based Deployment
APs connect to a cloud-managed platform (e.g., Cisco Meraki), which handles configuration, monitoring, and updates.

  • Ideal for: Multi-site businesses, retail chains
  • Benefits: Easy remote management, reduced on-site IT needs
  • Drawback: Requires reliable internet connectivity

Remote Branch Deployment
Designed for branch offices connected to a central hub, often using FlexConnect or SD-Branch solutions. Local switching is available even if WAN fails.

  • Ideal for: Branch offices with limited IT resources
  • Benefits: Central control, local resiliency
  • Drawback: Complex WAN dependency if not configured properly

Considerations When Choosing a Model

  • Scale: How many APs and locations are needed?
  • Control: Is centralized management essential?
  • Resiliency: What happens during WAN outages?
  • IT Resources: Is there staff available for on-site management?
  • Cost: Budget for hardware, licenses, and ongoing support

Config Insight: Basic AP Registration with Controller

AP# capwap ap controller ip address 192.168.100.10

Newsletter Form

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay ahead. Get the NETWORKENGR newsletter. Sign up below.


Launch Your Site Simply with Hostinger!